Broad¶
Broadening line spectrum with voigt profile
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from TRXASprefitpack import gen_theory_data
plt.rcParams["figure.figsize"] = (14,10)
basic defintion of gen_theory_data¶
help(gen_theory_data)
Help on function gen_theory_data in module TRXASprefitpack.mathfun.broad:
gen_theory_data(e: numpy.ndarray, peaks: numpy.ndarray, A: float, fwhm_G: float, fwhm_L: float, peak_factor: float, policy: Union[str, NoneType] = 'shift') -> numpy.ndarray
voigt broadening theoretically calculated lineshape spectrum
Args:
e: energy
A: scaling parameter
fwhm_G: full width at half maximum of gaussian shape (unit: same as energy)
fwhm_L: full width at half maximum of lorenzian shape (unit: same as energy)
peak_factor: Peak factor, its behavior depends on policy.
policy: Policy to match discrepency between experimental data and theoretical
spectrum.
* 'shift' : Default option, shift peak position by peak_factor
* 'scale' : scale peak position by peak_factor
Returns:
numpy ndarray of voigt broadened theoritical lineshape spectrum
Define line spectrum¶
Which has three peaks at 2833, 2835, 2838 eV with ratio 2:4:1
peaks = np.array([[2833, 2],
[2835, 4],
[2838, 2]])
e = np.arange(2830,2845, 0.01)
Gaussian broadening¶
fwhm_G = 1 eV
fwhm_G = 2 eV
fwhm_G = 3 eV
gau_broad_1eV = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 1, 0, 0) # Note voigt profile with fwhm_L = 0 is gaussian
gau_broad_2eV = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 2, 0, 0) # Note voigt profile with fwhm_L = 0 is gaussian
gau_broad_3eV = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 3, 0, 0) # Note voigt profile with fwhm_L = 0 is gaussian
plt.plot(e, gau_broad_1eV, label='gaussian broadening fwhm_G: 1 eV')
plt.plot(e, gau_broad_2eV, label='gaussian broadening fwhm_G: 2 eV')
plt.plot(e, gau_broad_3eV, label='gaussian broadening fwhm_G: 3 eV')
plt.legend()
plt.show()

Lorenzian broadening¶
fwhm_L = 1 eV
fwhm_L = 2 eV
fwhm_L = 3 eV
loren_broad_1eV = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 0, 1, 0) # Note voigt profile with fwhm_G = 0 is lorenzian
loren_broad_2eV = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 0, 2, 0) # Note voigt profile with fwhm_G = 0 is lorenzian
loren_broad_3eV = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 0, 3, 0) # Note voigt profile with fwhm_G = 0 is lorenzian
plt.plot(e, loren_broad_1eV, label='lorenzian broadening fwhm_L: 1 eV')
plt.plot(e, loren_broad_2eV, label='lorenzian broadening fwhm_L: 2 eV')
plt.plot(e, loren_broad_3eV, label='lorenzian broadening fwhm_L: 3 eV')
plt.legend()
plt.show()

voigt broadening¶
fwhm_G = 1.5eV, fwhm_L = 0.5eV
fwhm_G = 1.0eV, fwhm_L = 1.0eV
fwhm_G = 0.5eV, fwhm_L = 1.5eV
voigt_broad_1 = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 1.5, 0.5, 0)
voigt_broad_2 = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 1.0, 1.0, 0)
voigt_broad_3 = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 0.5, 1.5, 0)
plt.plot(e, voigt_broad_1, label='voigt broadening fwhm_G: 1.5 eV, fwhm_L: 0.5 eV')
plt.plot(e, voigt_broad_2, label='voigt broadening fwhm_G: 1.0 eV, fwhm_L: 1.0 eV')
plt.plot(e, voigt_broad_3, label='voigt broadening fwhm_G: 0.5 eV, fwhm_L: 1.5 eV')
plt.legend()
plt.show()

peak shift¶
To see how peak shift afftects broadened spectrum, set fwhm_G = fwhm_L = 1.0 eV
voigt_broad_peak_shift0 = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 1.0, 1.0, 0)
voigt_broad_peak_shiftm5 = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 1.0, 1.0, -5)
voigt_broad_peak_shift5 = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 1.0, 1.0, 5)
plt.plot(e, voigt_broad_peak_shift0, label='peak_shift: 0 eV')
plt.plot(e, voigt_broad_peak_shiftm5, label='peak_shift: -5 eV')
plt.plot(e, voigt_broad_peak_shift5, label='peak_shift: 5 eV')
plt.legend()
plt.show()

peak_shift moves spectrum to -peak_shift.
Intensity scaling¶
To see how intensity scaling afftects spectrum fix fwhm_G=fwhm_L=1.0 eV and peak_shift=0
A: 0.5
A: 1.0
A: 2.0
voigt_broad_scale_half = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 0.5, 1.0, 1.0, 0)
voigt_broad_scale1 = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 1, 1.0, 1.0, 0)
voigt_broad_scale2 = gen_theory_data(e, peaks, 2, 1.0, 1.0, 0)
plt.plot(e, voigt_broad_scale_half, label='A(scale): 0.5')
plt.plot(e, voigt_broad_scale1, label='A(scale): 1.0')
plt.plot(e, voigt_broad_scale2, label='A(scale): 2.0')
plt.legend()
plt.show()

Peak position scaling¶
Different from electron-excited spectrum, one can match theoretically calculated vibrational spectrum (IR, Raman) to experimental one by uniformly scaling peak position of theoretically calculated peaks
gen_thoery_data scales peak position instead of shifting by setting policy argument to scale
thy_ir_peak = np.array([[235, 661, 917, 1181, 1298, 1348, 1501, 1688, 3172, 3178, 3195
, 618, 826, 1036, 1175, 1200, 1394, 1433, 1501, 1597, 3181, 3208
, 92, 388, 484, 746, 892, 962]
,
[1.284, 0.803, 1.7269, 4.6578, 8.2517, 4.191, 1.2156, 6.8394, 10.9014, 16.4984, 73.323
, 8.1709, 0.0041, 3.9287, 1.2982, 1.6477, 4.005, 0.5812, 1.8711, 4.4402, 3.00e-04, 77.3937
, 0.8536, 0.0804, 12.81, 59.6901, 55.4987, 6.1347]])
thy_ir_peak = thy_ir_peak.T
nu = np.arange(200, 3500, 1)
fwhm_G = 15 # cm-1
pos_scale_1 = gen_theory_data(nu, thy_ir_peak, 1, fwhm_G, 0, 0.95, policy='scale')
pos_scale_2 = gen_theory_data(nu, thy_ir_peak, 1, fwhm_G, 0, 1, policy='scale')
pos_scale_3 = gen_theory_data(nu, thy_ir_peak, 1, fwhm_G, 0, 1.05, policy='scale')
plt.plot(nu, pos_scale_1, label='peak scale: 0.95')
plt.plot(nu, pos_scale_2, label='peak scale: 1')
plt.plot(nu, pos_scale_3, label='peak scale: 1.05')
plt.legend()
plt.xlim(300, 2000)
plt.ylim(0, 4.0)
plt.show()

plt.plot(nu, pos_scale_1, label='peak scale: 0.95')
plt.plot(nu, pos_scale_2, label='peak scale: 1')
plt.plot(nu, pos_scale_3, label='peak scale: 1.05')
plt.legend()
plt.xlim(2950, 3500)
plt.ylim(0, 6)
plt.show()
