Signal, Cauchy IRF

Exponential decay

When instrument response function is modeled as normalized cauchy distribution, experimental signal is modeled as convolution of exponentical decay and normalized cauchy distribution.

\[\begin{align*} {Signal}_c(t) &= ({model} * {irf})(t) \\ &= \frac{1}{\pi} \int_0^{\infty} \frac{\gamma \exp(-kx)}{(x-t)^2+\gamma^2} \mathrm{d}x \\ &= \frac{1}{\pi} \Im\left(\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\exp(-kx)}{(x-t)-i\gamma} \mathrm{d}x \right) \end{align*}\]

Assume \(k > 0\), and let \(u=k(x-t)-ik\gamma\), then \(u(x)\) does not cross negative real axis. Thus,

\[\begin{align*} {Signal}_c(t) &= \frac{1}{\pi} \exp(-kt) \Im\left(\exp(-ik\gamma) \int_{-kt-ik\gamma}^{\infty-ik\gamma} \frac{\exp(-u)}{u} \mathrm{d}u \right) \\ &= \frac{1}{\pi} \exp(-kt) \Im(\exp(-ik\gamma)E_1(-k(t+i\gamma)) \end{align*}\]

So, experimental signal could be modeled as

\[\begin{equation*} {Signal_c}(t) = \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{\pi}\arctan\left(\frac{t}{\gamma}\right)& \text{if $k=0$}, \\ \frac{\exp(-kt)}{\pi} \Im(\exp(-ik\gamma)E_1(-k(t+i\gamma)))& \text{if $k>0$}. \end{cases} \end{equation*}\]

\(E_1(z)\) is exponential integral, see dlmf section 6.2.

Implementation Note

At \(|kt| > 200\), the following asymptotic expression is used.

\[\begin{equation*} {Signal_c}(t) = -\frac{1}{\pi}\Im\left(\frac{1}{kt+i\gamma}\sum_{i=0}^{10} \frac{i!}{(kt+i\gamma)^i}\right) \end{equation*}\]

Damped oscillation

Define \(\omega = 2\pi/T\).

Note that

\[\begin{align*} {Model}(t) &= \exp\left(-kt\right)\cos\left(\omega t +\phi\right) \\ &= \frac{1}{2}\exp\left(-kt\right)\left(\exp\left(i \omega t + i\phi\right) + \exp\left(-i\omega t - i\phi\right)\right) \end{align*}\]

So, the convolution in the exponential decay section is divided by two parts.

\[\begin{equation*} {Model}(t) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \left(\Im\left(\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\exp(-kx+i\omega t)}{(x-t)-i\gamma} \mathrm{d}x \right)+\Im\left(\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\exp(-kx-i\omega t)}{(x-t)-i\gamma} \mathrm{d}x \right)\right) \end{equation*}\]

With the proper choice of integral path or proper change of variable, one can derive the following equation.

Let

\[\begin{align*} z_1 &= -kt - \omega \gamma + i (\omega t - k\gamma) \\ z_2 &= -kt + \omega \gamma - i (\omega t + k \gamma) \end{align*}\]

Then,

\[\begin{equation*} {Model}(t) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \left(\Im\left(\exp\left(z_1+i\phi\right)\left(i \pi - \mathrm{Ei}(-z_1)\right)\right) + \Im\left(\exp\left(z_2-i\phi\right)E_1(z_2)\right)\right) \end{equation*}\]

, where \(\mathrm{Ei}(z)\) is the another exponential integral.

When \(z\) is the complex number with \(\Im z \neq 0\),

\[\begin{equation*} \mathrm{Ei}(z) = -E_1(-z) + i \pi \cdot \mathrm{sgn} \left(\Im(z)\right) \end{equation*}\]

So, the experimental signal can be expressed to

\[\begin{equation*} {Model}(t) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \left(\Im\left(\exp\left(z_1+i\phi\right)\left(E_1(z_1) + i \pi \left(1+\mathrm{sgn}\left(\Im z_1 \right)\right)\right)\right) + \Im\left(\exp\left(z_2-i\phi\right)E_1(z_2)\right)\right) \end{equation*}\]